Exploring The Impact Of Paternalistic And Inclusive Leadership On Employee Performance: The Moderating Role Of Work-Related Expectation

Abstract

Background: In the healthcare sector, leadership styles significantly influence employee performance and patient outcomes. This study examines how paternalistic and inclusive leadership impact employee performance, with a particular focus on the moderating effect of work-related expectancies, grounded in expectancy theory.
Objectives: The primary aim is to assess the effects of paternalistic and inclusive leadership styles on job performance among middle-level employees in public and private healthcare sectors. Additionally, this research explores how work-related expectancies moderate this relationship, enhancing employees' motivation by linking job performance with potential rewards.
Methodology: Data were collected through a structured questionnaire distributed via email and social media platforms to middle-level employees in public and private healthcare organizations. Statistical software was used to analyze the data, testing the hypothesized relationships and the moderating impact of work-related expectancies.
Results: The findings indicate that both paternalistic and inclusive leadership positively influence employee performance, motivating employees to deliver optimal patient care and contribute effectively to organizational goals. Work-related expectancies significantly moderate the relationship, reinforcing employees' belief that superior performance will be rewarded.
Conclusion: This study highlights the role of work-related expectancies in enhancing the impact of leadership on employee performance in healthcare. By fostering a supportive and inclusive leadership approach, healthcare organizations can improve employee commitment and performance. The findings provide valuable insights for healthcare management to strengthen leader-employee connections and create a culture conducive to error-free, motivated performance.