Beyond Human Exceptionalism: Re-Reading Amitav Ghosh’s The Living Mountain From The Perspective Of Deep Ecology

Abstract

The interdependence between humans and nature is a dynamic process. The rampant misallocation of natural resources has placed us in an unregulated predicament. The deterioration of ecological calamities is exacerbating our connection with the natural world. Hence, the human tendency to prioritise their own interests and dominate nature should be reconsidered from a biocentric perspective. In this context, Worster argues, “We are facing a global crisis today, not because of how ecosystems function but rather because of howour ethical systems function” (27).Deep ecology is a developing field within the study of ecocriticism. Arne Naess, a philosopher from Norway, coined the term to foster ecological awareness and a sense of harmonious coexistence between humans and non-humans. Deep ecologists argue that humans are but one species among many in nature, rather than being superior.The notion that mankind is exceptional is rapidly driving us toward human-caused destruction of the natural world. Amitav Ghosh’s The Living Mountain (2022) delves into the complex interplay between humans and the natural world, with a specific focus on the Himalayas. This study examines the ecological issues present in Ghosh’s tale, with a focus on the interaction between nature and human existence. The research focuses on Ghosh’s literary strategies and how the novel functions as a means to promote ecological awareness. The analysis examines the consequences of Ghosh’s decisions, including the depiction of local communities, the effects of climate change, and the interdependent connection between man and nature.