Panaceans, utilitarians, and skeptics: A review of three decades of Community-Based Natural Resource Management in Namibia
Abstract
Community-Based Natural Resource Management (CBNRM) is a form of resource governance the objective of which is to achieve sustainable development and empower communities. CBNRM was demonstrably successful in the first twenty years of operation in Namibia but, over time, the literature on the topic has come to reflect the diminishing benefits derived from the program. As such, in this article I have divided the literature into three loose temporal groupings, which I have labelled panaceans, utilitarians and skeptics. The work of the panaceans appeared largely in the first decade of CBNRM in Namibia and view the program as having been successful in achieving the three goals of economic development, environmental conservation, and community empowerment. The utilitarians were less convinced by CBNRM, pointing out that while certain goals were achieved, others were not. The work of the skeptics has appeared more recently and suggests that those most marginalized in the rural communities which CBNRM is intended to help, do not benefit at all. The arguments of the three groupings have evolved over time and demonstrate the increasing challenges facing the programme as well as pointing to useful avenues for improvement.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
It is a condition of publication that authors vest the copyright of their reviews and articles, including abstracts, in the publisher of JNS, Otjivanda Presse. This enables us to ensure full copyright protection and the dissemination of the article and the journal to the widest possible readership. Authors may use the article elsewhere after publication as long as reference to its publication in JNS is provided. Authors are themselves responsible for obtaining permission to reproduce copyright material from other sources.